🏗️ Builder comparison
Compare Two Builders
Track record, construction quality, financial strength and litigation side by side. Figures a developer has never published read 'Not disclosed' — they never win a row.
| Metric | Nimbus Group | ABA Corp WINNER |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 1997 |
| Listed / Private | Listed (BSE, NSE) | Private |
| Completed projects | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Delivered (M sq ft) | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| On-time delivery % | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Construction quality | 2.9/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Delivery record | 2.8/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Customer satisfaction | 2.8/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Financial strength | 2.7/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Trust | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Litigation | No NCLT or insolvency proceedings found. A buyers’ group for an earlier IITL Nimbus launch, “The Golden Palm Village” in Sector 22A (booked about 2011–12), complained of delays and plan changes between 2012 and 2015 and sought refunds; Nimbus offered refunds with 12% simple interest in 2015. The final outcome is unknown, and it is not confirmed whether that launch sits on the same land as the current Palm Village project. UP-RERA complaint history was not checked. | Not disclosed |
| Expert rating | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
Where a builder has not been separately assessed on a dimension, the figure shown is derived from its overall rating. It keeps the comparison like-for-like, but it is one judgement rather than five.
Overall winner
ABA Corp
Cleo County delivered a genuinely differentiated community; narrow but competent.