🏗️ Builder comparison
Compare Two Builders
Track record, construction quality, financial strength and litigation side by side. Figures a developer has never published read 'Not disclosed' — they never win a row.
| Metric | ATS Infrastructure | ABA Corp WINNER |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1998 | 1997 |
| Listed / Private | Private | Private |
| Completed projects | 45 | Not disclosed |
| Delivered (M sq ft) | 30 | Not disclosed |
| On-time delivery % | 52% | Not disclosed |
| Construction quality | 4/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Delivery record | 2.5/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Customer satisfaction | 2.8/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Financial strength | 2.4/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Trust | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Litigation | Verified Aug 2026: ATS Knightsbridge exited insolvency via a Section 12A settlement (NCLT, Mar 2026) with handover targeted within 18–24 months; other group SPVs (ATS Infrabuild — Casa Espana Mohali; Ananda Divine Developers) have faced NCLT insolvency admissions. SPV-level diligence is essential. | Not disclosed |
| Expert rating | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
Where a builder has not been separately assessed on a dimension, the figure shown is derived from its overall rating. It keeps the comparison like-for-like, but it is one judgement rather than five.
Overall winner
ABA Corp
Cleo County delivered a genuinely differentiated community; narrow but competent.